This expression is used when someone seems to have been rendered speechless by a question or accusation. Ask Yahoo says there is no certainty about the origin, and the three guesses are all pretty disgusting. One is that liars had their tongues taken out and fed to the king’s cats in the Middle East. Another is that fear of being whipped with a cat-o-nine-tails renders a victim speechless. The final is that witches in the Middle East were feared and put to death. The cats of witches would control your tongue so you couldn’t report her.
Author Archives: advocate
The Worst Hard Time
I thought this book by Timothy Egan was difficult to review, and perhaps I should refer you to the 402 reviews on Amazon. Saying that, I am of compelled to write my review. The book provides an incredible history of the greatest environmental disaster in the history of the U.S., but the focus is on the people who endured the “Dust Bowl.” Were they brave and tough or just insane to continue to hang on while dust storms destroyed everything including their health and that of their children? I tried to imagine how we would react today. We whine when we are inconvenienced by road detours or when the price of gasoline increases. The people of the Dust Bowl endured while their children died of dust pneumonia and their crops blew away into to next state or even to the East Coast of the U.S. and left them penniless and in debt.
The book describes how the government and developers lured settlers to take advantage of the Homestead Act, settle on 160 acres of prairie, build a shack or dugout, rip up the sod, and plant wheat. There are several of the tough, brave, stubborn people that are followed throughout the book, which gives a sense of connection with them. The problem for someone looking for a less serious read is that the feelings are despair, fear, sadness, loneliness, and several other negative descriptions of desperate people living in poverty and misery.
Between 1925 and 1930 there were 5.2 million acres of native sod that had fed huge herds of buffalo and later cattle that was turned under to make wheat fields. All went well when above normal rains nurtured their crops and allowed the farmers to make what they thought were incredible profits. The price of wheat began to drop, and more land was plowed to try to retain profits by growing more wheat. Then the Great Depression hit, an eight year drought (called “drout” by the farmers) began, the grassless land dried, and fierce and frequent winds ripped off the top soil by millions of tons. The pictures of the rows of dirt collected around houses, fences, or any other obstruction are startling. The only business that seemed to be prospering was bootleg alcohol.
People and animals caught in the open when a dust storm struck often died or were blinded. Those who made it into their meager homes would hang up wet sheets as a last defense. One woman awakened and noted the only part of her pillow that wasn’t covered in dust was where her head had rested. There is even the sorrow for the animals that were often blind and died from malnutrition because their digestive tracts were filled with dirt.
The government had a direct role creating the conditions for the disaster. The 160 acres of prairie land was too little land to make a decent living with average rainfall. Then the government through the Federal Bureau of Soils proclaimed about replacing native grass with wheat land that the soil “…is the one resource that cannot be exhausted, that cannot be used up.”
The story of the people who were attracted to the plains is interesting and well told. Many were Germans who had immigrated to Russia and then were driven to immigrate to the U. S. during World War I. They brought the hard wheat that still flourishes in Kansas farms. The book called it “turkey red,” although I had always heard it called “Russian red.” The Germans also brought a few seeds of a thistle mixed in with their belongings. These thistles are well known as tumbleweeds in the plains, and they still pile up and obscure fence lines. The tumbleweeds were one of the few plants that survived the drought, and were mixed with salt to provide the last food many farmers could give their emaciated cattle. The farmers even began canning the tumbleweeds in brine to make food for them and their families.
There are interesting facts about politics. Herbert Hoover won the Presidency in a landslide in 1929 and then became one of the most disliked presidents in the history of the country as the Great Depression deepened and he refused to take government action while advocating that the free market would solve problems. One problem was that nature and not the free market was in charge of at least the center of the country. Even Joe Kennedy was scared by the depression. He told a friend, “I’m afraid I’m going to end up with nine kids, three homes, and no dough.”
I was interested in several aspects of the Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s presidency mentioned in the book. I’ve often wondered why my parents, who were farmers in the early part of their lives, were “Roosevelt Democrats.” Some economists argue that Roosevelt extended the Great Depression with his policies. My parents only knew, as the book portrays, that Roosevelt tried to do things that would make things better for desperate people. All manner of food sources were destroyed in an attempt to stabilize commodity prices while people were hungry in the cities. My mother often lamented, “I don’t know why they would just kill and bury the baby pigs.” No matter whether the actions of the FDR administration were wise; they gave people such as my parents hope. We moved off the farm for my father to take a government job designing the planting of rows of trees as windbreaks around farmsteads. FDR was a big fan of creating what he called “shelterbelts.”
FDR indeed tried just about everything to avert the poverty being created. The government did buy emaciated livestock to slaughter and bury them after people were allowed to try to salvage some of the meat. He paid farmers $498 to not plant their fields. He established the Civilian Conservation Corps to begin implementing ideas by Hugh Bennett on how to begin restoring grasslands. He was a hero to the poor because he provided money and jobs to millions that had nothing else. Late in the book Will Rogers is quoted as saying, “If Roosevelt burned down the Capital we would cheer and say, ‘Well, we at least got a fire started, anyhow’.”
One effect of the massive dust storms was the static electricity they created. Men avoided shaking hands, because the shock would knock them down. Cars were grounded by dragging chains to keep from shorting out electrical systems.
A man named Bam White settles when a horse dies and strands him and his family. He is eventually hired to be filmed with his horse pulling a plow around for the unheard of sum of $25 for two hours of plowing. He is the star of the movie The Plow That Broke the Plains. The movie was even played in the White House for FDR.
A newspaper writer described the dilemma of the plains saying “Three little words…rule life in the dust bowl of the continent—if it rains.” The term “Dust Bowl” stuck, and was even adopted by Hugh Bennett’s conservation project as “Operation Dust Bowl.” One of his ideas was to tap the “endless” Ogallala aquifer with 500 feet deep wells.
There was enough rain in 1937 to allow some crops and grass to begin to grow. Then grasshoppers arrived and ate everything. They ate every plant to the ground and were even chewing on the handles of rakes and hoes. It was estimated there were fourteen million grasshoppers per square mile.
The book ends with the death of the people followed throughout the story, including Bam White. I couldn’t help but think that they were finally released from their misery.
Go the Whole Hog
I selected this expression to post today because I posted both a review and blog about the book “Angry Pigs Organized Against Gerbils: The Farmer Island War.” Therefore, I am going whole hog on the web site today (and I probably should apologize).
I am often surprised about the origin of an expression, and that is the case with this one. I had believed that the wikianswers explanation was the obvious source. That site says that it originated from the Southern barbecue process of cooking and serving a whole hog, and that it is easy to see how going whole hog means going all the way. However, The Phrase Finder explains that the expression actually came from “…a rather obscure satirical work by…William Cowper.” The poem “…teases Muslims over the supposed ambiguity of restrictions against eating pork…” The gist is that each part of a hog is tested to learn which part wasn’t permissible to eat until the whole hog is eaten. (As an aside, a whole hog can easily feed fifty people.)
Book Club Review of Angry Pigs
We belong to a book club called “Denver Read and Feed,” and the club takes turns selecting a fiction book for everyone to read and hosts a meeting with a sit down meal to discuss the book or whatever else anyone wants to share. It was my turn, and the book I selected was “Angry Pigs Organized Against Gerbils: The Farmer Island War.” I am the author of that book and Andrew Brown, one of the four grandchildren listed in the book as “Creative Staff and Illustrators” attended the meeting. (The other three grandchildren are Davis K. Hobbs, Clayain M. Hobbs, and Campbell E. Brown.)
One tradition of the club is for each of the members to record their comments about the book in the “official record” and to rate it from one to ten, with one being pathetic and ten being excellent. I’ll turn over the review to the members after noting that Cathy and Tara were unable to attend, but Tara provided comments and a score by email.
Steve—What can I say, I loved the book. The story was original and well structured. The illustrations were very creative as well. Great book…8
Paul—This inspired me to look into publishing one of my own books. Great collaborative effort with the grandkids. I really liked the rat and pigeon spies. It surprised me that the kids wanted there to be killed animals in the book, but kids are more precocious that I was at that age. Good job. 7
Barb—Good story and delightful idea to co-write a book, granddad and grandchildren. 7.5
Steph—My favorite part of the book is the collaboration between the generations in making the book. My favorite part of the story is when the pigs matured (evolved) enough to realize they didn’t need war to fix a problem. 7
Frank—I think the story of how the book came about was at least as good as the book. I liked the escalation of the story and how the conflict was eventually resolved. Great illustrations as well. 7
Sally—Very interesting story about war and pigs. I liked the kid-friendly treatment of topics that were, frankly, above my head. I am interested to see where the story goes—next time, more character development would make it even better. Great illustrations and collaboration! 8.5
Farrel—Of course I loved this book, since I wrote it with the grandkids. 10 (of course!)
Sheryl—Cute book—nice story—painful to watch the person write—a fun and easy read. 7.5
Tara—I absolutely loved that you got your grandchildren involved in doing a book with you. What an amazing and powerful experience for them…! On content…my favorite part was the illustrations. They are so charming, intuitive and well done. I would have liked to have been there last night to tell the illustrator(s) personally. 🙂 I agree they should be darker in the next one, if only to make their specialness more apparent. The storyline had proper conflict and a positive resolution, which was important to this story. If I had any constructive criticisms…it would be to include more storyline detailing the characters themselves and their relationships with others. That being said, however, I loved the book!!! 10
Andrew—I think the book could have used a few more explosions, but overall, I really loved the book and my first time in book club. I also had a great time writing it with my grandad. 9 (Andrew was pleased that several book club members had him autograph his illustrations.
The composite score was 7.8, which is higher than the overall average for books read and rated by the members. Farrel and Andrew’s ratings were not included in that result. Information about the sequel is included in the “Continuing Adventures” link on our web site.
Rule of Thumb
Phrases.org.uk has some interesting discussion about the origin of this idiom. It has been incorrectly attributed to a supposed law in England in the 1700s that allowed a man to beat his wife as long as the stick was no thicker than his thumb. The origin is described as being unknown. However, it is speculated that thumbs have always been used to estimate distance by seeing how much of the object is covered by holding the thumb up and over the object. The thumb is also used to estimate the temperature of beer. The length of the thumb nail or the width of the thumb has also been used to estimate an inch.
The Litigators
This fiction book by John Grisham is entertaining and educational. It begins with a young lawyer working a hundred hours a week in a giant legal sweat shop snapping under the pressure, bolting out of the office, getting very drunk in the first bar he sees, and winding up in the office of two ambulance chasers based on an ad he sees about their specialty of defending drunk driving charges. The wife of the lawyer is perhaps the most understanding person on the planet, since she agrees with the decision to walk away from a job paying hundreds of thousands a year to one that pays perhaps a thousand a month. “Decision” is undoubtedly too strong of a word to describe the chain of events leading to the new job.
David Zinc’s new job is working with two men who can barely stand each other. They do have some skill at finding clients who might have a claim against someone or business that might have money. The woman who manages the office is much easier to like than either of the lawyers, and there is a crotchety dog that seems to have no role other than to occasionally growl when something irritates it.
David Zinc is portrayed as being meticulously ethical throughout the book, which might be the one part of the story some readers will find to be difficult to believe. I will say that there are some parts of the story that are predictable, but there are also some surprises.
One of the lawyers stumbles on the idea that the anti-cholesterol drug “Krayoxx” is killing people because of heart damage. He begins going anywhere there might be overly large people, such as an all-you-can-eat pizza restaurant, and hanging ads announcing the dangers of Krayoxx and offering the services of the law firm. Office activities become a constant search for people who have died after using Krayoxx or are still using the drug. The firm manages to sign up eight clients whose spouses have died and over 400 who are using the drug. They agree to join with a huge firm that has made billions in legal fees by specializing in suing drug companies.
The story that unfolds is an instructive trip through the process that is required to file and pursue a product liability suit and how the large pharmaceutical companies combat such suits. None of the three lawyers at the “boutique” law firm of Finley & Figg have ever been involved in such a suit, and there is an ominous feel to how they are spending money. They are forced to hire expensive “experts” willing to testify that a drug has caused damage regardless of whether the data actually supports such a finding. They also are burning through money from a loan on the office building to screen their living clients for heart damage. The results are not encouraging, unless the objective is to find healthy hearts.
Varrick Lab, the manufacturer of Krayoxx, identifies that that Finley &Figg is the least prepared law firm in the swarm that is gathering against them. They succeed at getting that firm’s suit to be heard quickly in the court of a federal judge who has a record of being impatient with frivolous suits. Oscar Finley, the lead lawyer for Finley and Figg collapses from a heart attack when he begins to give the opening argument and the other partner manages to cause a mistrial and accumulate $15,000 in fines and court costs by cracking a terrible joke, “Oh, the wonders of Krayoxx. Wally Figg, the remaining partner makes it through one day in court before he succumbs to alcohol and disappears. David Zinc is the last remaining lawyer to present the case for the firm, and his admirable wife agrees to set behind him and pretend to be a paralegal to give him moral support. The lawyers for the defendant seem almost compassionate about his dilemma.
David manages to make it though the case despite the horrible performance of their Russian-born “medical expert” who tries to explain why he thinks Krayoxx has damaged hearts in a mixture of Russian and broken English. The man who is supposed to serve as the next witness flees in terror before his court appearance. That leaves only the economist who presents information on how much the death of husband has cost the widow. The outcome of the trial is predictable, although David Zinc does surprise everyone in the court by making some strong points against Varrick Lab.
There are two side stories about David Zinc taking on the case of illegal immigrants being underpaid on a construction project and a Burmese couple, who are legal immigrants and whose son who is desperately brain damaged and ill from lead poisoning that resulted from ingesting paint on fake vampire fangs called “Nasty Teeth.” There is a somewhat difficult to believe story about David breaking the jaw of a man who posts anonymous blogs, including one in which he calls David’s wife a bimbo. David gets away with merely paying medical expenses.
I recommend the book and especially to people who own common stock in “big pharma.” The stocks of many of those companies are paying dividend rates that far exceed the traditional investments people have used for fixed income in the past, and there has been a rush to buy stocks that pay dividends. The book gives a running commentary on the price of Varrick Lab stock as it collapses with bad news about the lawsuit and rises when the news is better. People complain about the price of medications. The discussions of how much it costs to get a new drug approved and the litigation risks with putting it on the market made me think that the business has to be very profitable for companies to want to be in the business.