Present at the Creation: My Years in the State Department

present-at-creationThis autobiography by Dean Acheson, who was President Harry S. Truman’s trusted Secretary of State, is filled with information that would be interesting to anyone wanting to know more about the people and policies of the Truman administration. It is a very long book (over 700 pages excluding notes, references, and the index), and it is in small font. The title is derived from a quote from King of Spain Alphonso X, the Learned, 1252-1284, “Had I been present at the creation I would have given some useful hints for the better ordering of the universe.” I certainly had the impression that Mr. Acheson had no lack of confidence in his ability to make wise decisions about solutions to problems or making accurate judgments about people. There were a few cases where he writes that decisions proved to be a mistake, but those were the exception. He either writes with admiration and often affection for people or with open contempt. I don’t recall anyone being described other than in the two extremes. I also don’t recall a single circumstance where he describes Harry S. Truman with anything other than admiration. I have read in other sources that the respect was mutual; Harry considered Acheson his “second in command.” The office of the Vice President was vacant until Truman and his running mate, Alben Barkley took office in 1949 after winning the election in 1948. I don’t recall Barkley being prominently mentioned.

The book follows Acheson’s State Department career chronologically from being an Assistant Secretary of State 1941-1945, Under Secretary of State 1945-1947, to his tumultuous years of Secretary of State 1947-1953.  My primary interest in reading the book was the decisions of the Truman administration in containment of the Soviet Union during the Cold War and whether Acheson and others in the State Department were, as described by critics, “in the pocket of the Soviets.” To the contrary, Acheson describes relations with the Soviets in a non-flattering manner beginning early in the book. He says the Soviet diplomats “…cultivated boorishness as a method of showing their contempt for the capitalist world, with which they wanted minimum contact…” He mentions one Soviet diplomat named Oumansky who was killed in “…a plane crash of suspicious cause…” and that “…we felt no sense of loss.” Acheson would eventually come under constant attack and suspicion during the “red scare era,” but I never found an instance in the book where he displayed anything but distrust of Stalin and the Soviets. Continue reading

Well Behaved Women Seldom Make History

Scarlet SistersThe Scarlet Sisters, by Myra MacPherson, is subtitled Sex, Suffrage, and Scandal in the Gilded Age.  It is the story of “two improper Victorians” who were famous in their day for championing women’s rights and infamous for scandals.  Victoria Woodhull and Tennessee Claflin “rose from poverty, a trashy family, and a childhood of scam fortune-telling,” (including murderously sham cancer ‘treatments,’) “to become rich, powerful, and infamous.”  MacPherson notes that the sisters as well as their rivals and supporters wrote various lies and inconsistencies which make a biography difficult to assemble.

While I had not heard of the sisters before reading this book, they gained supporters and enemies whose names I recognize: the tycoon Cornelius Vanderbilt, suffragettes Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony, and radical socialist Karl Marx.  This is only a sample of their associates; the “Cast of Characters” lists fifty-two people.

Spiritualism was their usual entry into famous social circles, and the rags-to-riches backgrounds of many Gilded Age tycoons offered an accepting attitude towards their origins.  These connections supported them when they opened the first woman-owned brokerage house on Wall Street, where they made and lost a fortune. Continue reading

Scientific Quest to Understand, Enhance, and Empower the Mind

Future of the MindAuthor Michio Kaku is well known for his books and television popularizing science. He has recently tackled brain research.  His current book, The Future of the Mind, includes popular touches such as references to movies and TV and stories from his own life (wow, he was tough competition in high school science fairs!). The book has been on the New York Times best-seller list, and I thought it was a readable, well-prepared effort; I have watched some of Kaku’s TV shows and in places in the book I can hear his voice in my head as I read.  But somehow this book didn’t completely grab me.  I skimmed through some of the sections, but since the chapters can stand-alone, that worked well for me.

future Michio_Kaku_in_2012

Dr. Kaku

Kaku mentions Phineas Gage, whose accident in 1848 marked “the origins of modern neuroscience.”  When dynamite powder he was tamping down exploded, a metal rod rocketed completely through his head leaving behind massive brain damage, but Gage survived.  Kaku mentions the standard story that Gage’s personality was changed much for the worse by his accident. By coincidence, I found an article in Slate.com that says this standard story may be wrong, that the tale of his changed personality comes from a single, vague report immediately after the accident, and his subsequent life demonstrates he recovered to a remarkable extent.  But whatever the truth abut Gage, Kaku’s point remains: “it would alter the course of science.”  Continue reading

David and Goliath

Underdogs, Misfits, and the Art of Battling Giants
By Malcolm Gladwell

david and goliathThis book uses David and Goliath as a metaphor, but it’s not the metaphor you might expect.  Gladwell spends some time explaining the story and its setting in the ancient world, with notes on the surprising amount of scholarly research devoted to it. We modern Americans misunderstand the story’s intent and have the original message wrong.

 

David_and_Goliath public domain

Public Domain in the US: copyright expired

We think of David as a hopeless underdog facing an unbeatable foe, saved only by divine intervention.  “No one in ancient times would have doubted David’s tactical advantage once it was known he was an expert in slinging.”  Gladwell writes that soldiers trained to use sling shots were as formidable as archers.  Goliath was a heavily armored infantry warrior and there was no way he could chase down and engage David; he was a sitting duck. (He may have also had acromegaly: speculation on the diseases of historical figures is always intriguing, even if they are seldom provable.)  I found this part of the book surprisingly interesting and fun; much better than the “favorite Bible stories for children” sort of idea I had before. Continue reading

History Decoded

History DecodedThis site usually reviews serious books of history, sometimes ponderously serious books.  This book is more like “anti-history”; it’s subtitled: The 10 Greatest Conspiracies of All Time.

The book arises from the TV show Decoded on the History network, and presents the crew’s favorite conspiracy theories.  As is typical for such shows, they never resolve any of their mysteries.

wikianswers defines a conspiracy theory as “a version of events that a group of people believe to be true in direct conflict to the official version.”  I think of such theories as pointing to sinister forces, viewed by non-believers as wacky and immune to facts (since anyone who disputes the theory could be one of the conspirators).

The book “give[s] you our theories – plus the sensible and logical questions to ask – and then you decide who you believe.”  This “you decide” presentation sounds appealing, but, of course, as a reader you only have the information the writer chose to offer.  But these are popular theories, so you’ll find more information on the Internet, where you must sort out reliable sources from wackadoodles.  (I like to start with Wikipedia; at least it receives input from multiple sources and has an editing policy.) Continue reading

Partners in Command

The subtitle of this book by Mark Perry is “George Marshall and Dwight Eisenhower in War and Peace. The book begins with a chronology of George Marshall’s and Dwight Eisenhower’s lives, their military service, and the major battles of World War II. The focus is on the European theatre. Review of the chronology and the listings of major military commanders and politicians at the end of the epilogue give a quick snapshot of the events of World War II. That would be useful to a casual reader, because the book is written in incredible detail. A major focus of the book is the constant and difficult conflict between the Americans and the British. The conflicts occur at nearly every step of the planning and execution of military plans. The descriptions are undoubtedly historically accurate, but I found them tedious to read.

The Prologue describes the remarkable relationship between Confederates Robert E. Lee and Thomas Jonathan “Stonewall” Jackson and their connections with the Virginia Military Institute where George Marshall was a student and teacher. “In time he came to revere Lee and Jackson, and throughout his life he named them the two men he admired most.” The book describes that Lee chose Jackson to lead the fight and George Catlett Marshall chose Dwight Eisenhower as his partner in command. Continue reading