Things that Matter

cover - things matterThis book was a wonderful Christmas present and contains a collection of the brilliant writings of Charles Krauthammer.  Dr. Krauthammer’s personal story is, in my judgment, even more fascinating than his book. He was “playing hooky” from classes as a medical student when he suffered a broken neck diving into a private swimming pool. The university was convinced to provide him classes at his hospital bed, and he finished his doctorate in psychiatry. He did not learn to handwrite for three years and he remains confined in a wheelchair. He was named by the Financial Times “…the most influential commentator in the nation.” Liberals, Conservatives, and Libertarians can all learn from this book, although I expect Conservatives and Libertarians will be more comfortable with what they read.

Chapter 1 titled “Marcel, My Brother’ is touching. Marcel is described as a brilliant doctor and professor of medicine. He was four years older than Charles, and was a magnificent athlete. When Marcel’s friends were organizing pick-up games they all understood the rule:  “Charlie Plays. The corollary was understood” If Charlie doesn’t play, Marcel doesn’t play.” The chapter was written ten days after Marcel died. It is a powerful chapter.  The words convey the love and respect Charlie felt for Marcel and a sense of the depth of emotion from the loss. I can’t imagine a more powerful first chapter. Continue reading

The Evils of the Permanent Political Class

ExtortionExtortion , by Peter Schweizer, presents a depressing thesis: while special interests “are influencing and distorting our government in the search for favorable policies… a deeper, more sinister problem [exists]: politics is corrupting money.”

Members of what Schweizer calls the Permanent Political Class use their power to extort money from businesses.  Both parties, and the executive branch as well as the legislative branch engage in Mafia-like practices.  “Campaign money and lobbying contracts are ‘protection money’… donors feel victimized.”

This is not a new problem. Schweizer traces this problem back to the late 1800s, and also notes that Dante placed corrupt politicians in the eighth circle of hell.  But the book concentrates on recent and current events. Continue reading

The Next Economy and America’s Future

aftershock 1Aftershock – by Robert B. Reich

There are many ways to learn about Reich’s views on the economy.  He starred in a recent documentary, in theaters last September http://inequalityforall.com/.  A lengthy interview with Reich regarding the movie is here.  He has also been interviewed in many places; I recently heard him on the Commonwealth Club radio program.

I suggest you read his book.  It is current (copyright 2010, 2011, 2013) and, especially in the appendix, has informative graphs that present well on my e-reader.  The short book (136 pages in the main body) is so packed with information that it makes for a long review.

Reich says the basic bargain of America is that workers receive a proportionate share of economic growth; that wages correlate with productivity.  He disputes Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly who called him a communist who secretly adores Karl Marx: “I’m not, and I don’t” Reich says.  “Inequality is inevitable and desirable.  It gives people incentive… But at some point inequality of income and wealth becomes so wide as to harm society.” Continue reading

Darkness at Noon

darkness at noonThis book was written by Arthur Koestler in German and was translated into English by his companion, Daphne Hardy. It is considered a classic novel, and was considered in the selection of the “greatest legal novels.” The book gives an insight into the Stalin show trials that resulted in the execution of his enemies, most of his friends, and a large number of people who were just trying to stay out of trouble and alive. Very few members of the “first Congress of the Communist Party” who were included in a group photograph from early in the revolution were still alive by the beginning of the book. The efforts to erase those who had been executed had ended, and the only remaining evidence was the light rectangle on the walls where the picture had once been displayed. Comrade Nicholas Salmanovitch Rubashov was a senior official of the Party, but his time had run out. He had demonstrated willingness to sacrifice lovers, friends, and comrades who were designated by central authorities as the enemy. The book begins with his arrest and imprisonment, and he knew and accepted that his years of loyalty would not save him from charges that he had violated official edicts of the Party. Continue reading

Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher

I was disturbed by the celebrations in the streets of Britain when Margret Thatcher died, and I decided I needed to know more about the “Iron Lady.” I found this book and was instantly intrigued by the title. I expect Reagan fans, and I’m definitely in that camp, will enjoy the book more than those opposed to Reagan’s politics. Apparently there are many in Britain who are not Thatcher fans, and I will guess they won’t like this book. However, I think anyone interested in the history of the Cold War would enjoy reading or at least be interested in this book.

The subtitle of the Nicholas Wapshott book is “A Political Marriage,” and I found it remarkable how close Reagan and Thatcher were. I got the impression from reading the personal messages between them that they were uncomfortable with how close they were. Prime Minister Thatcher probably had to worry the most; her opponents tagged her as “Reagan’s Poodle.” The reality was that she often displayed the strongest will in disagreements and Reagan worked his personality overtime when he thought he taken a position that had disappointed or angered her. Reagan, to his credit, valued her directness and council. Continue reading

Guest Commentary on “The Closing of the Muslim Mind”

A review of this book by Robert R. Reilly was posted in September, and one reader was inspired to purchase the book, read it, and provide personal observations. I continue to recommend the book. I especially recommend it to those who believe that we can depend on “moderate Muslims” to allow logic to prevail in the dealings between Christians and Muslims. The book indicates there are only pure Islamists and infidels; there is no such thing as a “moderate Muslim.” I struggled with whether the following is commentary or an extension of the review, so I’m posting it as both. With that introduction, the following is the input from the “Guest Commenter.”

During my time on the Yucca Mountain Project, I worked with a very devout Sunni Muslim Imam.  He provided me with a couple of books on Islam that were written by Muslims and we had several discussions that left me wondering why our philosophical views were so different.  He is a fine fellow and I do not mean to disparage his theological or philosophical outlook.  However “The Closing of the Muslim Mind” provided a context that makes understanding his viewpoints much easier. Continue reading