The Worst Hard Time

worst-hard-timeI thought this book by Timothy Egan was difficult to review, and perhaps I should refer you to the 402 reviews on Amazon. Saying that, I am of compelled to write my review. The book provides an incredible history of the greatest environmental disaster in the history of the U.S., but the focus is on the people who endured the “Dust Bowl.” Were they brave and tough or just insane to continue to hang on while dust storms destroyed everything including their health and that of their children? I tried to imagine how we would react today. We whine when we are inconvenienced by road detours or when the price of gasoline increases. The people of the Dust Bowl endured while their children died of dust pneumonia and their crops blew away into to next state or even to the East Coast of the U.S. and left them penniless and in debt.

The book describes how the government and developers lured settlers to take advantage of the Homestead Act, settle on 160 acres of prairie, build a shack or dugout, rip up the sod, and plant wheat. There are several of the tough, brave, stubborn people that are followed throughout the book, which gives a sense of connection with them. The problem for someone looking for a less serious read is that the feelings are despair, fear, sadness, loneliness, and several other negative descriptions of desperate people living in poverty and misery.

Between 1925 and 1930 there were 5.2 million acres of native sod that had fed huge herds of buffalo and later cattle that was turned under to make wheat fields. All went well when above normal rains nurtured their crops and allowed the farmers to make what they thought were incredible profits. The price of wheat began to drop, and more land was plowed to try to retain profits by growing more wheat. Then the Great Depression hit, an eight year drought (called “drout” by the farmers) began, the grassless land dried, and fierce and frequent winds ripped off the top soil by millions of tons. The pictures of the rows of dirt collected around houses, fences, or any other obstruction are startling. The only business that seemed to be prospering was bootleg alcohol.

People and animals caught in the open when a dust storm struck often died or were blinded. Those who made it into their meager homes would hang up wet sheets as a last defense. One woman awakened and noted the only part of her pillow that wasn’t covered in dust was where her head had rested. There is even the sorrow for the animals that were often blind and died from malnutrition because their digestive tracts were filled with dirt.

The government had a direct role creating the conditions for the disaster. The 160 acres of prairie land was too little land to make a decent living with average rainfall. Then the government through the Federal Bureau of Soils proclaimed about replacing native grass with wheat land that the soil “…is the one resource that cannot be exhausted, that cannot be used up.”

The story of the people who were attracted to the plains is interesting and well told. Many were Germans who had immigrated to Russia and then were driven to immigrate to the U. S. during World War I. They brought the hard wheat that still flourishes in Kansas farms. The book called it “turkey red,” although I had always heard it called “Russian red.” The Germans also brought a few seeds of a thistle mixed in with their belongings. These thistles are well known as tumbleweeds in the plains, and they still pile up and obscure fence lines. The tumbleweeds were one of the few plants that survived the drought, and were mixed with salt to provide the last food many farmers could give their emaciated cattle. The farmers even began canning the tumbleweeds in brine to make food for them and their families.

There are interesting facts about politics. Herbert Hoover won the Presidency in a landslide in 1929 and then became one of the most disliked presidents in the history of the country as the Great Depression deepened and he refused to take government action while advocating that the free market would solve problems. One problem was that nature and not the free market was in charge of at least the center of the country. Even Joe Kennedy was scared by the depression. He told a friend, “I’m afraid I’m going to end up with nine kids, three homes, and no dough.”

I was interested in several aspects of the Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s presidency mentioned in the book. I’ve often wondered why my parents, who were farmers in the early part of their lives, were “Roosevelt Democrats.” Some economists argue that Roosevelt extended the Great Depression with his policies. My parents only knew, as the book portrays, that Roosevelt tried to do things that would make things better for desperate people. All manner of food sources were destroyed in an attempt to stabilize commodity prices while people were hungry in the cities. My mother often lamented, “I don’t know why they would just kill and bury the baby pigs.” No matter whether the actions of the FDR administration were wise; they gave people such as my parents hope. We moved off the farm for my father to take a government job designing the planting of rows of trees as windbreaks around farmsteads. FDR was a big fan of creating what he called “shelterbelts.”

FDR indeed tried just about everything to avert the poverty being created. The government did buy emaciated livestock to slaughter and bury them after people were allowed to try to salvage some of the meat. He paid farmers $498 to not plant their fields. He established the Civilian Conservation Corps to begin implementing ideas by Hugh Bennett on how to begin restoring grasslands. He was a hero to the poor because he provided money and jobs to millions that had nothing else. Late in the book Will Rogers is quoted as saying, “If Roosevelt burned down the Capital we would cheer and say, ‘Well, we at least got a fire started, anyhow’.”

One effect of the massive dust storms was the static electricity they created. Men avoided shaking hands, because the shock would knock them down. Cars were grounded by dragging chains to keep from shorting out electrical systems.

A man named Bam White settles when a horse dies and strands him and his family. He is eventually hired to be filmed with his horse pulling a plow around for the unheard of sum of $25 for two hours of plowing. He is the star of the movie The Plow That Broke the Plains. The movie was even played in the White House for FDR.

A newspaper writer described the dilemma of the plains saying “Three little words…rule life in the dust bowl of the continent—if it rains.” The term “Dust Bowl” stuck, and was even adopted by Hugh Bennett’s conservation project as “Operation Dust Bowl.” One of his ideas was to tap the “endless” Ogallala aquifer with 500 feet deep wells.

There was enough rain in 1937 to allow some crops and grass to begin to grow. Then grasshoppers arrived and ate everything. They ate every plant to the ground and were even chewing on the handles of rakes and hoes. It was estimated there were fourteen million grasshoppers per square mile.

The book ends with the death of the people followed throughout the story, including Bam White. I couldn’t help but think that they were finally released from their misery.

Book Club Review of Angry Pigs

apoagWe belong to a book club called “Denver Read and Feed,” and the club takes turns selecting a fiction book for everyone to read and hosts a meeting with a sit down meal to discuss the book or whatever else anyone wants to share. It was my turn, and the book I selected was “Angry Pigs Organized Against Gerbils: The Farmer Island War.” I am the author of that book and Andrew Brown, one of the four grandchildren listed in the book as “Creative Staff and Illustrators” attended the meeting. (The other three grandchildren are Davis K. Hobbs, Clayain M. Hobbs, and Campbell E. Brown.)

One tradition of the club is for each of the members to record their comments about the book in the “official record” and to rate it from one to ten, with one being pathetic and ten being excellent. I’ll turn over the review to the members after noting that Cathy and Tara were unable to attend, but Tara provided comments and a score by email.

Steve—What can I say, I loved the book. The story was original and well structured. The illustrations were very creative as well. Great book…8

Paul—This inspired me to look into publishing one of my own books. Great collaborative effort with the grandkids. I really liked the rat and pigeon spies. It surprised me that the kids wanted there to be killed animals in the book, but kids are more precocious that I was at that age. Good job. 7

Barb—Good story and delightful idea to co-write a book, granddad and grandchildren. 7.5

Steph—My favorite part of the book is the collaboration between the generations in making the book. My favorite part of the story is when the pigs matured (evolved) enough to realize they didn’t need war to fix a problem. 7

Frank—I think the story of how the book came about was at least as good as the book. I liked the escalation of the story and how the conflict was eventually resolved. Great illustrations as well. 7

Sally—Very interesting story about war and pigs. I liked the kid-friendly treatment of topics that were, frankly, above my head. I am interested to see where the story goes—next time, more character development would make it even better. Great illustrations and collaboration! 8.5

Farrel—Of course I loved this book, since I wrote it with the grandkids. 10 (of course!)

Sheryl—Cute book—nice story—painful to watch the person write—a fun and easy read. 7.5

Tara—I absolutely loved that you got your grandchildren involved in doing a book with you. What an amazing and powerful experience for them…! On content…my favorite part was the illustrations. They are so charming, intuitive and well done. I would have liked to have been there last night to tell the illustrator(s) personally. 🙂 I agree they should be darker in the next one, if only to make their specialness more apparent. The storyline had proper conflict and a positive resolution, which was important to this story. If I had any constructive criticisms…it would be to include more storyline detailing the characters themselves and their relationships with others. That being said, however, I loved the book!!! 10

Andrew—I think the book could have used a few more explosions, but overall, I really loved the book and my first time in book club. I also had a great time writing it with my grandad. 9 (Andrew was pleased  that several book club members had him autograph his illustrations.

The composite score was 7.8, which is higher than the overall average for books read and rated by the members. Farrel and Andrew’s ratings were not included in that result. 

Information about the sequel is included in the “Continuing Adventures” link on our web site.

The Litigators

the-litigatorsThis fiction book by John Grisham is entertaining and educational. It begins with a young lawyer working a hundred hours a week in a giant legal sweat shop snapping under the pressure, bolting out of the office, getting very drunk in the first bar he sees, and winding up in the office of two ambulance chasers based on an ad he sees about their specialty of defending drunk driving charges. The wife of the lawyer is perhaps the most understanding person on the planet, since she agrees with the decision to walk away from a job paying hundreds of thousands a year to one that pays perhaps a thousand a month. “Decision” is undoubtedly too strong of a word to describe the chain of events leading to the new job.

David Zinc’s new job is working with two men who can barely stand each other. They do have some skill at finding clients who might have a claim against someone or business that might have money. The woman who manages the office is much easier to like than either of the lawyers, and there is a crotchety dog that seems to have no role other than to occasionally growl when something irritates it.

David Zinc is portrayed as being meticulously ethical throughout the book, which might be the one part of the story some readers will find to be difficult to believe. I will say that there are some parts of the story that are predictable, but there are also some surprises.

One of the lawyers stumbles on the idea that the anti-cholesterol drug “Krayoxx” is killing people because of heart damage. He begins going anywhere there might be overly large people, such as an all-you-can-eat pizza restaurant, and hanging ads announcing the dangers of Krayoxx and offering the services of the law firm. Office activities become a constant search for people who have died after using Krayoxx or are still using the drug. The firm manages to sign up eight clients whose spouses have died and over 400 who are using the drug. They agree to join with a huge firm that has made billions in legal fees by specializing in suing drug companies.

The story that unfolds is an instructive trip through the process that is required to file and pursue a product liability suit and how the large pharmaceutical companies combat such suits. None of the three lawyers at the “boutique” law firm of Finley & Figg have ever been involved in such a suit, and there is an ominous feel to how they are spending money. They are forced to hire expensive “experts” willing to testify that a drug has caused damage regardless of whether the data actually supports such a finding. They also are burning through money from a loan on the office building to screen their living clients for heart damage. The results are not encouraging, unless the objective is to find healthy hearts.

Varrick Lab, the manufacturer of Krayoxx, identifies that that Finley &Figg is the least prepared law firm in the swarm that is gathering against them. They succeed at getting that firm’s suit to be heard quickly in the court of a federal judge who has a record of being impatient with frivolous suits. Oscar Finley, the lead lawyer for Finley and Figg collapses from a heart attack when he begins to give the opening argument and the other partner manages to cause a mistrial and accumulate $15,000 in fines and court costs by cracking a terrible joke, “Oh, the wonders of Krayoxx. Wally Figg, the remaining partner makes it through one day in court before he succumbs to alcohol and disappears. David Zinc is the last remaining lawyer to present the case for the firm, and his admirable wife agrees to set behind him and pretend to be a paralegal to give him moral support. The lawyers for the defendant seem almost compassionate about his dilemma.

David manages to make it though the case despite the horrible performance of their Russian-born “medical expert” who tries to explain why he thinks Krayoxx has damaged hearts in a mixture of Russian and broken English. The man who is supposed to serve as the next witness flees in terror before his court appearance. That leaves only the economist who presents information on how much the death of husband has cost the widow. The outcome of the trial is predictable, although David Zinc does surprise everyone in the court by making some strong points against Varrick Lab.

There are two side stories about David Zinc taking on the case of illegal immigrants being underpaid on a construction project and a Burmese couple, who are legal immigrants and whose son who is desperately brain damaged and ill from lead poisoning that resulted from ingesting paint on fake vampire fangs called “Nasty Teeth.” There is a somewhat difficult to believe story about David breaking the jaw of a man who posts anonymous blogs, including one in which he calls David’s wife a bimbo. David gets away with merely paying medical expenses.

I recommend the book and especially to people who own common stock in “big pharma.” The stocks of many of those companies are paying dividend rates that far exceed the traditional investments people have used for fixed income in the past, and there has been a rush to buy stocks that pay dividends. The book gives a running commentary on the price of Varrick Lab stock as it collapses with bad news about the lawsuit and rises when the news is better. People complain about the price of medications. The discussions of how much it costs to get a new drug approved and the litigation risks with putting it on the market made me think that the business has to be very profitable for companies to want to be in the business.

The Reshaping of Everyday Life: 1790 – 1840

Reviewed by Kathy London

reshapingI just read on livescience “Almost two-thirds of Americans [surveyed] said the …country is moving away from traditional notions of the ideal life…” We seem to have been moving away for a long time.

Jack Larkin’s book was written about a time period I assumed was stable and uneventful: America after the Revolution and before the Civil War. But Americans at the end of that period “looked back with a sense of profound change in customs, manners and social tone…. already nostalgic for vanishing ways of …life.”

Surviving artifacts at museums and historic sites suggest Americans lived a comfortable life in the late 1700s. This is far from true. Larkin offers a compelling description of the reality, often gritty, dirty, smelly, tedious, and backbreaking; but also based on deeply intertwined economic and social relationships.

An industrial economy was replacing self-sufficient farms, rural artisans, and barter. Even farming became more business-like and less communal. Trends started in the Northern cities of New York, Boston, and Philadelphia, spread to Northern rural areas, then gradually to the South and West. Attitudes changed towards drinking, childrearing, education, the role of wage labor, diet, sexual habits, and slavery. While change was unevenly distributed, many Americans reshaped much of their everyday world.

Larkin includes black Americans in every section of his book with a surprising amount of detail. Almost all were slaves and their llives were as hard as you might guess. Only a few pages are devoted to Native Americans, who had been driven out of the states.

The book covers too wide a swath of life to mention all the topics in this review but I’ll discuss a few.

Americans have always been in motion. A person would live for a while at a neighbor’s to pay barter debts or earn extra resources, or spend months living with married siblings. (“Living” and “working” were synonymous.) Hired help moved frequently. Every year, close to a quarter of all Bostonians changed their residence. In one central Massachusetts community, over a third of households counted in one census moved before the next one. In frontier towns, two-thirds might move. Itinerant peddlers, tinkers, showmen, portrait painters, and various teachers roamed the roads bringing novelty to rural communities.

Settlers on the frontier might go months without seeing anyone outside their household, but in well-established communities, men and women visited neighbors daily. There were “frolics” to husk corn or raise barns, Sunday meetings, sewing circles, nursing help, and afternoon tea. Visitors would often “tarry” overnight. Socializing moved in time with agricultural work. Visits were shorter during planting and harvesting. To bring in the Northern hay crop, other activities stopped and even shops closed as everyone went to the hay fields.

Health care was one of the most egalitarian aspects of American life. The most expensive care was as (in)effective as home remedies. “Humors” were believed to be out of balance in patients and had to be corrected by inducing bleeding, blistering, purging, or puking. No wonder homeopathy became popular – at least it didn’t hurt the patient. Despite the sorry state of medicine, there was one major success: the discovery that infecting people with the mild disease cowpox protected them from smallpox.

Casual violence was part of daily life. Social ways were painfully coarse, sometimes cruel and violent, even bizarre. Drunkenness was astonishingly common. “Blood sports” showed people’s indifference to the suffering of animals. Duels were fought between gentlemen, and fights between common men could end with an eye gouged out. White Southerners lived in fear of their slaves, but “in daily reality, slaves has far more to fear from them.” The Temperance Movement, the “Second Great Awakening” of religion, and efforts by the well-off to “advance civilization” make a lot more sense given this context.

Early American homes were dingy, unadorned, and surrounded with trash. But people must have yearned for decoration. I was struck by the image of a woman, after a long day of hard labor, taking the time to sweep a pattern into the sand floor of her kitchen before going to bed.

Larkin draws on a vast array of primary sources, including diaries and journals, letters of foreign travelers, probate inventories, federal censuses, and contemporary books. I was intrigued by the unique 1798 Direct Tax records: created to support the first Federal property tax, assessors recorded every free family’s possessions and dwelling in detail.

Larkin presents a thorough picture of life across America into the 1800s, enlivened with quotes from primary sources and full of evocative details. It provides an excellent context to any other histories you may read about this era.

The Cross and the Crescent: A History of the Crusades

crescentI’ve always believed I am quite poorly informed about the Crusades and have read that Muslim resentment continues to this day about the many invasions to “cast the infidels out of the Holy Land.” I don’t think my understanding of the crusades improved much after reading this book by Malcom Billings. There is significant detail of people, alliances, paths taken to the various battle sites, battles, and outcomes. What the Crusades accomplished for the Catholic Church still seems to me to be a mystery. The Church certainly sent several Crusades of tens of thousands of loyal worshipers off to what was death or slavery for many or most. Crusaders often had to give up everything to fund their preparations to arm and equip themselves and their entourage for a brutally hazardous trip for the honor of dying on the journey, fighting to the death or being enslaved in a faraway location. The book was prepared as a companion to a BBC radio series, and perhaps the radio shows in combination with the book would have left me feeling a bit more comfortable.

I’m not going to try to sort out the overwhelming amount of information about the countless Crusades, but there were some interesting factoids, and I did learn a few things. For example, the Pope Urban II “preached” the first crusade in 1096, and a key figure was a very strange sounding man called Peter the Hermit. The beginning of that crusade was consistent with what happened on many of the crusades. There were 800 Jews slaughtered by the crusaders as they were setting out for the Holy Land.

There are references to towns at various locations along the path to the Holy Land being sacked and inhabitants raped and murdered during many of the crusades. It seems the Crusaders often contained bands of murderous thieves. On the other side there were the Knights Templar who were generally quite admirable and the Knights of Saint John, or Hospitalers, who dedicated themselves to caring for the sick and injured.

I challenge anyone to keep up with the numerous popes “preaching” Crusades and threatening to cast anyone failing to answer the call from the church. There was one remarkable time when there were three claiming to be pope, and they were calling for Crusades to support their claim to the position.

Many of the battles were over some location where there was supposed to be a religious relic to be recovered. It sounded as if there were enough “splinters of the true cross” that someone could have assembled several crosses. Two gruesome relics were the decapitated heads of Saint Peter and Saint Paul. There were also numerous references to pieces of bones of various saints. The battles were often sieges against massive castles, and the book has photographs of the remnants of many of those.

It sounded as if the greatest challenge to crusaders was to survive the trip to the battle. The journey was long and the paths often took them over mountain ranges with brutal weather and little food to be scavenged. Many of the crusaders and their horses and other livestock died on the way. Then they faced well rested and equally dedicated foes intent on killing them. The battles were vicious affairs. There was one description that so many arrows were launched at the crusaders that it wasn’t uncommon for someone to survive but “look like a porcupine” with all the arrows that had struck them. There were some acts of kindness, but mostly victors slaughtered the fallen indiscriminately. The only survivors of a defeated city, regardless of whether the defeated were Christian or Muslim, would be sold into slavery. The value of slaves plummeted because of the Crusades. One man was sold for the “price of a shoe” in a time when there was such a glut of slaves.

I mentioned some interesting factoids. Richard the Lionhearted defeated the followers of Isaac Ducas Comnenus, who called himself “Emperor of Cyprus” and had made an alliance with Saladin (I include these details to demonstrate the level of detail in the book). The “Emperor” was brought before Richard and said his only request was, “…that he might not be placed in fetters and manacles of iron.” The King “…ordered fetters and manacles of silver and gold be made for him.” Richard died of infection after he was shot by a crossbow bolt during a siege of a castle in Aquitaine (just as portrayed in the Russell Crowe movie “Robin Hood”).

A good example of the senseless brutality was a battle where Christians fought alongside Muslims against a Crusader assault on the town of Beziers. The Crusaders won and 7000 people from the town packed themselves into the church. The church was ordered to be burned, and when told that there were Christians in the church the “…papal legate then made a remark that has resounded through the centuries. ‘Kill them all, God will know his own’.”

Perhaps the most interesting factoid was the siege of Kerak by Saladin against “…Reynald of Chatillion who had been Prince of Antioch…” Reynald was hosting a wedding party when Saladin’s forces arrived, and the festivities continued while the artillery barrage pounded the walls. The bridegroom’s mother sent some dishes from the wedding feast to Saladin’s tent. “He chivalrously responded by enquiring where the newlyweds were sleeping, and gave orders to his artillery to ease up on that part of the citadel!”

I’ve been interested in the insanity of the “Children’s Crusade,” and there were only a couple of pages with little information about the Crusade. A shepherd named Stephen preached a Crusade in 1212 for children based on what he said was a vision of Christ. There is a picture of the Crusade, which was said to be consisted of thousands of children aged 6 to teenagers, riding hobby horses on their way to the Holy Land. The only survivors I noted were those who were loaded into ships that sailed to Egypt where they were immediately captured on arrival and sold into slavery.

Popes did not learn from the insanity of the Children’s Crusade. There were Crusades being “preached” by Popes as late as 1798.

True Grit

true-gritThis book by Charles Portis is considered a classic, and it deserves the title. I normally don’t review fiction books, but decided to review this one because it was the recent selection of our “Denver Read and Feed” book club. The main character of the story is fourteen year old Mattie Ross, who is on a mission to avenge the murder of her father at the hands of a hired hand who had been treated kindly by the father. Tom Chaney had not only killed her father but had taken his horse, $150 in cash, and two California gold pieces. Mattie hired Marshall Rooster Cogburn (played by John Wayne in the first movie) and they were joined by a Texas Ranger named LaBoeuf (pronounced LaBeef) who is also seeking Tom Clancy for another murder. 

One book club member who reviewed a draft of this review commented that it doesn’t have enough information “…about the characters,the scene, the mood, the story line, or the writing style.” That’s all true, and I will refer to the many reviews on Amazon that can fill in that information (because I’m too lazy to add it myself.) Better yet, read the book. You’ll be glad you did.

I’m going to first put aside some quibbles I have with the story and then turn the review over to some selected comments recorded by some members of the book club. The first quibble is mention of a drummer staying in the boarding house with Mattie and others who sold “pocket calculators.” Various other True Grit fans have tried to figure this out also. One theory was that it referred to an “Addiator,” but those weren’t made until about 1920 and the time frame for the story is about 1870. There was a “Gem” calculator made in England between about 1880 and 1890, but it was used to calculate English money. One credible idea is that the reference was to slide rules, which were around in the proper time frame.

Another quibble is that newspaper editors were called “cheap skates.” I’ve described the origin of that term on the expression link of this web site, and it is said to not have come into existence in late 1800s to describe a worn out horse or “second-rate sportsman.” It was also used to describe roller skates made beginning in the early 1900s that were literally so cheap that it was difficult to keep them on. Also in the early 1900s there was a panhandler named Kate who became wealthy but continued to beg. People began to say about thrifty people that they were as “cheap as Kate,” which soon evolved into “cheapskate.”

There is a description of Mattie fetching water for the evening campsite, and she was staggering under the weight of two buckets. Rooster told her she looked like a “hog on ice.” The origin of that term was the first posting on the expression link of this web site. Hogs are said to be more or less helpless on ice, because their hooves do not give them traction. Anyone looking clumsy could be described described as a “hog on ice.” It also was used to describe someone who is so full of themselves that they ignore others and charge ahead without regard for consequences.

I will concede that the historical “inconsistencies” might have resulted from the fact the author (Mattie) was “writing” several years or decades after the events described in the book. Regardless, I consider this to be a wonderful book!

I’ll now turn the review to the book club members, who gave the book an above average score of 7.6 on a scale of 1 to 10.

Steve—”I found the book somewhat appealing. It had some great narratives… (7)

Sheryl—”Fun to read. I liked the movie better.” (6)

Farrel—”Interesting book despite some…inaccuracies. (8)

Stephanie—”Hilarious dialogue and a fun story…I liked Mattie Ross and found the story interesting.”(7)

Barb—”I love the use of language in this book and the story is genuinely gripping.” (A later email comment added, “I think Mattie’s early adventure with Rooster and LeBoeuf spoiled her for less dramatic relationships, and that’s why she never married.” (9)

Cathy—”Once I got started, I really enjoyed it. I liked Mattie. Rooster annoyed me at times, but I thought it was a good story.” (7)

Paul—”Even a hick 14-year old doesn’t speak like this. Regardless, she was annoying. I kept thinking, ‘I don’t care’.” (5)

Sally—”I loved this book. It was an engaging and quick read. I loved Mattie Ross…” (9)

Tara–True Grit was interesting but not believable.” (8)

Frank—I liked this book and liked the feeling and I guess the sense of time. It was great. (9)